Forward »

What ‘If Not Now’ Got Wrong About The Dyke March

July 5, 2017 | post a comment | Philip Johnson

When people ask what gives me hope that the American Jewish community will one day defend freedom and justice for Israelis and Palestinians, rather than defending Benjamin Netanyahu, I answer: “If Not Now.” A Millennial-powered movement, speaking in an authentically Jewish idiom, which challenges American Jewish leaders to meet the moral responsibilities of power, is exactly what American Jewry needs.

The more important If Not Now becomes, the greater the challenges it will face, not only in its relationship with the organized American Jewish community but in its relationship with the activist left. Last month, If Not Now faced such a challenge as a result of the furor surrounding Chicago’s Dyke March. I don’t think it responded well.

There are basically two versions of what happened at the June 24 march. The first is that the organizers of the militantly left-wing LGBTQ protest rally evicted a handful of marchers because they were Jewish. That’s probably wrong. As Jewish Voice for Peace-Chicago has noted, “Many other Jews…were present at Dyke March wearing Jewish symbols, including Stars of David, t-shirts with Hebrew, kippot, and sashes with Yiddish script, and none of them were asked to leave the event, interrogated about their politics, or were the target of any complaints because of their visible Jewish presence.”

The second version, which is likely closer to the truth, is that the marchers were evicted for being Zionists. The marchers, at least one of whom works for a group that combats the “demonizing and delegitimizing” of the Israeli government, waved rainbow flags with a Star of David in its center. March organizers claim they also tried to drown out pro-Palestinian chants, though that’s disputed. Either way, some Palestinian marchers objected. When the Jewish marchers acknowledged that they were Zionists, organizers explained that Zionism violated the march’s “anti-racist core values” and asked them to leave.

In response, If Not Now’s Chicago wing issued a statement. It denied that the removal of the marchers constituted “an explicit targeting of Jews with Jewish symbols” and claimed instead that it “was part of a larger, longer conversation around Palestinian liberation.” That’s oddly euphemistic. The marchers were ejected for being Zionists. If Not Now itself does not do that. On its website, it declares, “We do not take a unified stance on BDS, Zionism or the question of statehood.” That means that Zionists, as well as anti-Zionists, are welcome.

Why is it okay for the organizers of the Dyke March to impose a litmus test that If Not Now itself does not? The next paragraph hints at an answer: “We believe it is essential to uphold the leadership of queer people of color exemplified by the Chicago Dyke March Collective, and to support the important work they do.” In other words, we think the Dyke March Collective does great things, and we want to support queer people of color, so we’re going to give them a pass on banning Zionists even though we don’t support doing so ourselves.

That sounds a lot like If Not Now’s response to the platform laid out last year by The Movement for Black Lives, which said that America “is complicit in the genocide taking place against the Palestinian people” by Israel. In response, If Not Now congratulated the Movement for its “visionary leadership” and declared that, “We refuse to be distracted” by “11 words in the Movement for Black Lives platform.”

If Not Now does not accuse Israel of genocide. But it wouldn’t criticize the 11 words in the Black Lives platform that do.

This constitutes an abdication. It’s fine to defend the broad goals of Black Lives Matter and the Dyke March. It’s fine to defend the importance of black and queer political leadership. It’s fine to criticize the American Jewish establishment for paying too much attention to the anti-Israel left, and not enough attention to Israel’s morally indefensible policies. But it’s not fine to refuse to defend your beliefs just because the people violating them are less privileged than you.

If the price of being an ally to activists of color is never publicly disagreeing with them, then the price is too high.

There’s an irony here. The American Jewish right sometimes claims that Diaspora Jews can’t criticize Israel unless they live there. They claim, in other words, that what is being said is less important than who is saying it. By giving the Dyke March and Black Lives Matter a pass, If Not Now is doing something similar. It is implying that, when it comes to Israel, what those organizations say and do matters less than who their members are.

That’s a mistake. Maimonides famously said he would “accept the truth from whatever source.” It Not Now should be willingly to acknowledge falsehood from whatever source too.

« Trump’s Celebration of an Exclusionary Vision of Freedom

Why Won’t the Democrats Challenge Trump on North Korea? »

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.